You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘Business Analytics’ category.
Category Archive
Make It Simple for Customers To Engage with You
May 8, 2012 in Customer Performance Management (CPM), Workforce Performance Management (WPM), Sales Performance Management (SPM), Business Analytics, Cloud Computing, Social Media, Business Collaboration | Tags: 360-degree view of the Customer, Agent Performance Management, Call Center, Cloud Computing, Contact Center, Contact Center Analytics, CRM, Customer Analytics, Customer Data Management, Customer Experience Management, Customer Feedback Management, Customer Service, Desktop Analytics, Predictive Analytics, Social CRM, Speech Analytics, Text Analytics, Unified Communications, Voice of the Customer, Workforce Management | by Richard Snow | Leave a comment
A recent research project involving 7,000 consumers carried out by the Harvard Business Review concluded that to retain customers and get them to buy more products, organizations must make it simple for people to engage with them, provide information they trust and allow them to weigh their options before they buy. The research found that consumers are bombarded with information and choices, and as a result they tend to go down the easiest route, which often leads them to take a blinkered view: I haven’t got the time and energy to consider options so I’ll take this one.
If you extrapolate this thinking into the domain of customer service, or more widely into the way organizations manage customer interactions, you might conclude that companies would be smart to support one channel of communication, do it right, and tell customers “this is the way it is,” in much the way online retailers and some banks support only Web-based interactions.
However, that approach flies in the face of my recent benchmark research into customer relationship maturity, which found that on average, in response to growing customer demand, organizations support four or five channels of communications, and many support eight or more, including telephone, email, fax, postal mail, text messaging, the Web, instant messaging, online collaboration, video and social media. This complicates the task of simplifying interaction and forces organizations to make some tough decisions.
As our CRM maturity research shows, and as was confirmed at a recent customer engagement day, two fundamental issues prevent many organizations from taking a consistent approach to handling multimedia customer interactions. First, to support multiple communications channels, the majority of organizations have implemented stand-alone, proprietary systems. Integrating these to provide a seamless, common user experience is complicated, time-consuming and costly. Second, few companies have a single source of customer data and information to enable decisions and actions at every touch point, preventing customers from having consistent experiences.
The solution to both of these issues is to upgrade the organization’s IT architecture or to look for smarter, less invasive options. Three approaches come to mind:
- Implement one of the fully integrated multimedia communications management systems. Several of these are available as cloud-based systems, which afford companies the opportunity to take this step at reduced costs and in a more timely manner.
- Implement a smart agent desktop system. These can hide complex systems behind a user interface that reflects only what the agent requires to meet customer expectations. They can extract data from systems based on predefined rules, and they include rules-driven processes that allow users to focus on customers.
- Implement one of the new forms of self-service that are coming to market. These include software agents for virtual conversations, visual IVR and mobile applications that allow customers to serve themselves from their smartphones or tablets. Since all of these are software-based, they can be programmed to follow defined processes for handling different interaction types, and to use the most up-to-date data. To avoid making some of the mistakes that organizations have made companies should put themselves in their customers’ shoes and ensure that these new self-service applications are programmed to meet customer expectations instead of forcing them to use annoying and prolonged procedures.
The idea of making it simple for customers to engage with a business is reflected in one of the latest metrics being used by organizations – customer effort scores. This metric seeks to determine how easy customers find it to interact with an organization. If they can be used to drive improvement, customer effort scores may help businesses provide easier ways to engage, which should lead to more satisfied customers and better business results.
Do you make it easy for your customers to engage with you? If so, tell us more and collaborate with me on next steps.
Regards
Richard Snow – VP & Research Director
Like this:
Customer Engagement Day Reveals New Issues and Opportunity
May 1, 2012 in Business Analytics, Business Collaboration, Business Intelligence (BI), Business Mobility, Cloud Computing, Customer Performance Management (CPM), Financial Performance Management (FPM), Governance, Risk & Compliance (GRC), Information Applications (IA), Information Management (IM), IT Performance Management (ITPM), Operational Performance Management (OPM), Sales Performance Management (SPM), Social Media, Supply Chain Performance Management (SCPM), Sustainability, Workforce Performance Management (WPM) | Tags: 360-degree view of the Customer, Agent Performance Management, Call Center, Cloud Computing, Contact Center, Contact Center Analytics, CRM, Customer Analytics, Customer Data Management, Customer Experience Management, Customer Feedback Management, Customer Service, Desktop Analytics, Genesys, InContact, Interactive Intelligence, NICE Systems, Noble Systems, Predictive Analytics, Social CRM, Speech Analytics, Text Analytics, Unified Communications, Verint, Voice of the Customer, Workforce Management | by Richard Snow | Leave a comment
I recently attended the second in the series of customer engagement days organized by the Directors Club (GB & NI). The format of the event was the same as the first day that I wrote about and included three keynote presentations and three roundtable sessions where attendees discussed how organizations should engage with customers. As for the first event I chaired the roundtable on perfecting multichannel customer engagement in the contact center and gave a keynote on how social media is impacting the contact center.
In contrast to the first event, here I found less adoption of multimedia customer engagement, with more of the attendees saying that they are experimenting with different channels of engagement but haven’t settled on new strategies. A particular issue was raised by several organizations from the insurance industry, whose multichannel plans are hampered by a legal requirement to conduct many customer interactions in written form. They spoke of being “snowed under” with paper and as a consequence trying to determine how often they can use non-paper channels.
Another big issue nearly all the organizations face is the large number of systems they already have to manage, the number of new systems they would need to manage multiple channels of communication and the challenge of integrating all these to produce a consistent experience across channels and a single view of customer channel usage. As I discovered in my research into the adoption of a contact center in the cloud, many organizations are finding the answer to these problems lies in the adoption of preintegrated channel management systems from vendors such as Genesys, inContact, Interactive Intelligence and Noble Systems, and cross-channel analytics from vendors such as NICE Systems and Verint.
As I tweeted at the time, the discussions raised what for me was a familiar idea, that “companies need more joined-up thinking.” As my research into customer relationship maturity shows, organizations still store information in silos, which minimize sharing of processes, information or systems. This separation makes is difficult to take steps that would deliver consistent, appropriate experiences across all touch points. One of the participants in my roundtable said the organization had some success using customer journey maps to help plan customer engagement touch points within a channel but hadn’t thought to use them to map a customer’s journey across different channels. I believe that journey mapping could help organizations identify and thus remove some of the less sensible steps they make customers go through and help them see engagements from the customer’s point of view.
As at the previous event, even before I gave my presentation on social media, the topic of using social media came up in all three roundtable sessions. In this case more organizations are experimenting with social media rather than building it into their overall customer service strategy. That said, almost all agreed that they need to make social media a two-way channel of communication with customers and not just a place where customers raise issues or make complaints that are not addressed. These views are in line with my research, which shows that the use of social medial by organizations is growing but has yet to be adopted as a mainstream channel for customer service; indeed many of the attendees agreed that responsibility for social media remains with Marketing and thus is used mainly to carry out low-cost marketing campaigns.
Perhaps the most pleasing part of the day was the chairman’s roundup of key points coming out of the roundtable discussions. As the different chairpersons summed up their discussions, I often heard the sentiment that the “customer should come first,” whether in developing a multimedia customer service strategy, mobile applications to support customers or Web-based self-service, or generally becoming a “social enterprise.”
All-in-all, the day raised more questions than answers, but everyone appreciated the opportunity to join the debate. Won’t you please come and collaborate with me.
Regards
Richard Snow – VP & Research Director

Business Exchange
Klout
LinkedIn
Plaxo
Twitter
Facebook Fan Page
Facebook Group
Google+
Ventana Research Website
Recent Comments