You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Merced Systems’ tag.

Ventana Research’s benchmark research into agent performance management shows that most companies recognize the vital role contact center agents play in creating good customer experiences and thus good business outcomes. The research also shows that only the most mature companies have put in place processes and metrics that encourage behaviors that deliver such business outcomes. Furthermore, the research shows that companies are held back from adopting more customer-related metrics because they don’t have performance management tools that can help them create such metrics; instead most rely heavily on spreadsheets. Thus I was encouraged to hear during a recent roundtable discussion sponsored by Merced Systems from two customers that have used the Merced Performance Suite to institute a more rigorous, metrics-driven approach to improving agent performance.  

The speakers indicated that a company cannot significantly improve contact center performance solely by deploying new technology. Rather, it can reach its ultimate goals only by changing processes and people – mainly by training and coaching agents. To do this in an effective manner requires a deep analysis of agent-by-agent performance and a system that points managers and supervisors to areas that need improving. Without this individualized analysis, training and coaching tends toward a “one size fits all” situation that doesn’t address individual agents’ needs. Companies therefore need to adopt a system that suggests which calls evaluators should listen to so they can quickly identify areas of weakness – for example, some agents may perform poorly during the greeting, or fail to give callers the required compliance information

Another important message from the discussion is that companies must review their key performance metrics regularly and modify them to better reflect the organization’s business goals and desired outcomes. This often is not done: in our  benchmark research into contact center analytics the number-one performance metric in the contact center is average handling time, which doesn’t connect directly to the most important metric to executives, which is customer satisfaction scores.  

Both speakers were adamant that managing to averages doesn’t work and said that companies would do better to focus on the best and worst performers: the first to set goals that others should aspire to, and the second to assess where the most training and coaching is needed. It is also important to manage to trends; that is, a metric by itself is of limited use, but implementing training and coaching to reverse a trend or improve performance is likely to be effective. 

This led to a discussion of key experiences with the performance management application. First and foremost, it needs to be widely adopted, which one of the speakers admitted did require a little “encouragement” for some reluctant supervisors and agents. The key to adoption is that everyone trusts the outcomes and they be consistent. This way users don’t feel Big Brother is watching for ways to take away performance-related pay, but that supervisors are honestly looking for genuine ways to improve performance. Sharing performance information with everyone, subject to some confidentiality restrictions, can produce an environment where everyone is trying to improve their own performance. 

Finally, the speakers insisted that any program must be a continuous improvement process. Despite expressing pride in their processes and agents, they acknowledged room for improvement, which can be brought about only by more targeted coaching. One company thus implemented a closed-loopmetrics-driven quality monitoring process that uses analytics to identify areas where agents need to improve, targeted coaching to address those issues and trend analysis to ensure that the coaching is effective. 

Do you use any form of analytics to drive your quality monitoring or performance management processes? If so, please tell us about them, and come collaborate with me and discuss your efforts.  

Regards 

Richard Snow – VP & Research Director

Merced Systems provides software to support performance management in both sales and service. Its products extract data from various systems to produce business-related reports, dashboards, scorecards and analysis that help companies improve performance in these two key functions. To further its efforts, Merced recently invited around 100 partners, customers and prospects to its 360 Degree Performance Management Forum in London. As well as the usual presentations and demonstrations to convey its messages, successes and strategy, the customer presentations provided practical insights into how companies use these products to gain real business benefits. Since my colleague covered Merced’s U.S. event in depth on applications and technology, I will assess one of the customer presentations in more depth.

Orange, a unit of France Telecom, showed how it used Merced Systems software to drive innovative initiatives to improve customer service. By the admission of its speaker, Orange had fallen short of providing excellent customer service, so it set up a program called Brilliance to find out why it had failed and to do something about it. As is the norm for most such initiatives, the first step was to ask employees, especially front-line customer service representatives, what was going wrong.

The conclusions the team came to were far from normal. First was the realization that there is a “new norm” for customer service. Customers have become more demanding and want to communicate through more channels of communication; there is more competition, and it moves faster at developing new products and services; Orange was creating more and more data (much of it unstructured such as text and voice recordings) but using less of it; and last but not least these demanding customers are not shy about telling the world on social media about any of a company’s shortcomings. Perhaps many of you are aware of these trends, but the question is whether your company has acknowledged this new norm and adapted to it.

This time Orange went down a different path than in the past. Initially its findings pointed to the two factors usually blamed for holding back performance: culture and processes, summed up in the old phrase “We have always done it like this so why change?” At this point, many people throw into the pot that “the systems” are also getting in the way, and so we can’t change without changing them. Deeper analysis, inspired by the observation that the top 20 percent of performers get great results despite issues with culture, processes and systems, showed that the real problem was “the people.” This label encompasses several factors: Not everyone has the same abilities, not everyone was aware of or following best practices, some of the key performance metrics were not driving the best behavior, training and coaching were largely “one size fits all” and didn’t address individual needs, and individuals weren’t being given the information they needed to monitor their performance or compare it to team performance and targets. All of these are bad news, as I wrote in a white paper, “Aligning Your Business through Sales and Service Performance Management”.

The Brilliance program set about addressing these issues, which included making a few process changes. And all this was enabled by using the latest versions of the Merced Systems products, which supported Orange’s efforts to face up to the new norm by changing the key performance indicators (KPIs), enabling users to access all the data they need, focusing coaching and training on individual needs, rewarding everyone involved in front-line customer service based on reliable, consistent and highly visible performance information, and putting the information into individuals’ hands so they were motivated to improve. In a highly innovative step, the last process is being extended to motivate the best performers to help less effective ones and thus raise the whole team’s performance.

As I have indicated, none of this is possible without the right information being in the hands of the right people at the right time. In this regard the latest benchmark research from Ventana Research into the use of analytics shows that many companies lack products to drive these kinds of initiatives. Merced Systems can fill the gap between sales and customer service, two areas that are increasingly blending into one, and so companies looking to improve in these areas would do well to evaluate what it has to offer. I also found that Merced has capabilities in quality monitoring of agents, which had not been evident until my recent analysis.

Is sales performance an issue for your company? Likewise, is service performance an issue? Has your company faced up to the new norm? If you get either of these aspects wrong, not only will your business suffer, but the world will hear about your shortcomings through social media.

Let me know your thoughts or come and collaborate with me on Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Regards,

Richard Snow, VP & Research Director

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 11 other followers

Twitter Updates

Blog Stats

  • 11,198 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.