You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘NICE Systems’ tag.

I recently attended the second in the series of customer engagement days organized by the Directors Club (GB & NI). The format of the event was the same as the first day that I wrote about and included three keynote presentations and three roundtable sessions where attendees discussed how organizations should engage with customers. As for the first event I chaired the roundtable on perfecting multichannel customer engagement in the contact center and gave a keynote on how social media is impacting the contact center.

In contrast to the first event, here I found less adoption of multimedia customer engagement, with more of the attendees saying that they are experimenting with different channels of engagement but haven’t settled on new strategies. A particular issue was raised by several organizations from the insurance industry, whose multichannel plans are hampered by a legal requirement to conduct many customer interactions in written form. They spoke of being “snowed under” with paper and as a consequence trying to determine how often they can use non-paper channels.

Another big issue nearly all the organizations face is the large number of systems they already have to manage, the number of new systems they would need to manage multiple channels of communication and the challenge of integrating all these to produce a consistent experience across channels and a single view of customer channel usage. As I discovered in my research into the adoption of a contact center in the cloud, many organizations are finding the answer to these problems lies in the adoption of preintegrated channel management systems from vendors such as GenesysinContactInteractive Intelligence and Noble Systems, and cross-channel analytics from vendors such as NICE Systems and Verint.

As I tweeted at the time, the discussions raised what for me was a familiar idea, that “companies need more joined-up thinking.” As my research into customer relationship maturity shows, organizations still store information in silos, which minimize sharing of processes, information or systems. This separation makes is difficult to take steps that would deliver consistent, appropriate experiences across all touch points. One of the participants in my roundtable said the organization had some success using customer journey maps to help plan customer engagement touch points within a channel but hadn’t thought to use them to map a customer’s journey across different channels. I believe that journey mapping could help organizations identify and thus remove some of the less sensible steps they make customers go through and help them see engagements from the customer’s point of view.

As at the previous event, even before I gave my presentation on social media, the topic of using social media came up in all three roundtable sessions. In this case more organizations are experimenting with social media rather than building it into their overall customer service strategy. That said, almost all agreed that they need to make social media a two-way channel of communication with customers and not just a place where customers raise issues or make complaints that are not addressed. These views are in line with my research, which shows that the use of social medial by organizations is growing but has yet to be adopted as a mainstream channel for customer service; indeed many of the attendees agreed that responsibility for social media remains with Marketing and thus is used mainly to carry out low-cost marketing campaigns.

Perhaps the most pleasing part of the day was the chairman’s roundup of key points coming out of the roundtable discussions. As the different chairpersons summed up their discussions, I often heard the sentiment that the “customer should come first,” whether in developing a multimedia customer service strategy, mobile applications to support customers or Web-based self-service, or generally becoming a “social enterprise.”

All-in-all, the day raised more questions than answers, but everyone appreciated the opportunity to join the debate. Won’t you please come and collaborate with me.

Regards

Richard Snow – VP & Research Director

A few weeks back I wrote about how NICE Systems was venturing into the back office and my surprise that the core smart desktop product it had acquired with eglue, while a key part of this initiative, seemed to have disappeared as a stand-alone offering. Since then NICE has corrected my impression, pointing out that the product is still available in pretty much the same form as always. The problem is that you have to look hard to find it because it has been renamed Real-Time Process Optimization. If you follow this link, you won’t see confirmation that this really is the eglue product, but I assure you it is.

By whatever name, the software is now part of the overall NICE SmartCenter suite and does what it always did. Bringing all the systems and data that an agent needs to handle customer interactions together in a single window, it allows agents to drill down into this information by clicks of a mouse, and it pops information onto the desktop to guide agents on what they should do next. It is highly configurable and can be set up to work for different users and to meet a company’s business rules, such as for dealing with regulatory issues or driving up-sell opportunities. Real-Time Process Optimization also has taken over as the main system to collect and analyze desktop usage. The result is a smart desktop that can reduce average call-handling time, increase first-call-resolution rates and customer satisfaction, reduce training times for agents and their frustration in having to use a cumbersome desktop, and ensure that agents follow defined best practices for interaction-handling.

As those of you that follow me regularly will know, I am a great advocate of the smart desktop. It responds to one of the greatest challenges companies face today – improving customer satisfaction with the way their calls are handled in a contact center. My research into customer experience management shows that the majority of companies recognize they are not very good at this and are losing money and business because of it. The smart desktop, plus more focused agent training, is essential for companies to address this issue. The majority of agent desktops now in use can only be described as a mess, and they force agents to use multiple desktops to access different systems, typically having to log in to multiple systems to get the information they need. Agents sometimes have to navigate across systems and jump through multiple screens within an application just to complete the simplest of tasks. This effort keeps callers waiting, often produces conflicting information and fails to resolve their issues – an unpleasant experience that costs the company more than it ought to. Companies looking to invest in systems to address these issues should consider NICE Systems and its Real-Time Process Optimization product, which retains the features of the old eglue product and is certainly up to the task.

Has your company recognized the benefits a smart desktop can bring?

Let me know your thoughts or come and collaborate with me on Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Regards,

Richard Snow – VP & Research Director

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 11 other followers

Twitter Updates

Blog Stats

  • 11,198 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.