You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘Social Media’ tag.

A few weeks ago I wrote a blog discussing salesforce.com (SFDC) Chatter and the buzz the technology is making in which one of my biggest questions was how a non-SFDC customer could justify purchasing Chatter. Well I finally got to speak with someone who has paid at least partially for Chatter. I say partially because this particular customer already has several hundred licenses with SFDC (which entitle them to use Chatter for free) but has paid for several hundred other users to also have access.

If you aren’t familiar with Chatter, it is basically Facebook for the enterprise; it looks like Facebook, it supports similar functionality, and it works in the same way, but because it is inside the enterprise firewall it is more secure. Chatter provides three core functions: a means to communicate, a means to collaborate and a means to tag files so that authorized users get automatic notices when the file is changed. But except for the extent of collaboration, most companies already have systems in place that supply these functions. So why spend on Chatter?

The customer I spoke with mostly confirmed what non-paying customers previously told me: It is extremely hard to put together a solid financial case for investing in Chatter. This particular customer based the case on things such as it would save money spent on having geographically dispersed groups physically get together because they could communicate and collaborate remotely, and it would reduce the volume of e-mail.

The common theme in all my conversations about this is that the case revolves around collaboration and the change of corporate culture that brings about. I have written many times that a big issue with customer experience management is that customers interact with different lines of business and through many channels of communication, and these interactions are not handled consistently simply because of barriers that exist between the lines of business – including the contact center.

Chatter could be the tool that finally resolves that issue. It makes it easy to communicate with like-minded people who are working on similar issues. It makes it easy for groups to work on common tasks such as sharing best practices. It makes it simpler for people to share information, such as when putting together a proposal. It gets everyone using one source of information – for example, the corporate sales presentation or even corporate key performance indicators. In general terms it breaks down barriers and makes it easier for a company’s employees to work as one, or as one person recently put it, it lets big companies work like small companies, no matter how geographically dispersed they are. It also can link your set of applications and systems to provide notifications on orders processed to customer complaints through what my colleague recently covered with iWay Software (See: ”iWay Software Connects Salesforce Chatter to the Enterprise“)

Once Chatter is implemented, said every customer I spoke to, paying or not, with the support of a few power users adoption rates are amazingly high (and not just for Generation X users) and there would be a riot if the company turned it off. Nevertheless it is not evident what the business case is – what makes Chatter worth spending money on. Yes, people cooperate more, and so outputs are improved and tasks accomplished more quickly. People are more aware of what others are doing because they share more. But there is nothing on which to quantify dollars and cents. So from my perspective, companies have to think outside the box to make the case for adoption. If it breaks down barriers so a company works more efficiently – and in particular if customer service becomes more effective through increased collaboration – then I think alongside other initiatives to improve performance, companies should take a look at how Chatter might contribute.

Let me know your thoughts or come and collaborate with me on Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Regards,

Richard Snow – VP & Research Director

On Wednesday, September 9, 2010 the massive marketing machine called salesforce.com rolled into London to stage its 2010 Cloudforce event at the Royal Festival Hall. The clout of CEO Mark Benioff and his team in the IT industry was evident in the fact that at short notice they could postpone the event by a day and still get about 3,000 attendees, stage a massive partner show and put on a keynote speech and side events that kept the attendees busy and informed about latest developments with salesforce.com and its customers and partners. But through it all one thing stood out – Chatter.

For the few who haven’t heard of it, Chatter is one of the latest offerings from salesforce.com, and some observers call it “Facebook for the enterprise.” Being a very entrepreneurial and innovative CEO, Benioff had spotted that many of his employees, and millions of other people, had changed their communication habits and instead of using the phone (and to a certain extent, e-mail) had turned to social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter and YouTube to interact with their friends and colleagues. Eager not to miss out on this trend, and determined to make this sort of environment safer and thus more attractive to the enterprise, the team created Chatter. It includes many of Facebook’s central capabilities: You can write on someone’s wall, you can have groups and followers, you can get notices when other people send you “stuff,” and you can collaborate on chosen issues. Chatter adds some enterprise-focused capabilities; for example, you can tag a data item – a word processing document or presentation, let’s say – and if anyone changes that item all followers will be notified immediately. To jump-start adoption, the company made it free for all salesforce customers and is Chatter-enabling many of its applications. For example, Chatter enables users of Service Cloud 2 to collaborate easily on trying to resolve a customer case in the CRM application as I have written that customer service is expanding with the new age of social media (See: “Customer Service in the Social Media Age“).

One can’t but agree that social media use is going to keep growing and could become the primary way younger generations interact with each other and companies. But what does Chatter do for business? As I have already said, it is free for existing customers, and I spoke to half a dozen early adopters, asking what benefits they have found and whether they would still use it if it wasn’t free. Their answers have been pretty similar: E-mail volumes have gone down, actions happen more quickly (people said sales get closed quicker, customer cases get closed quicker, and presentations and proposals are prepared faster), there is more cooperation across business units, more users are adopting the core applications because “it kind of makes you,” and management knows more about what is going on. These are clearly benefits, perhaps intangible because no one could actually quantify their value monetarily. This is interesting because everyone I talked to said they would go on using it even if they had to pay for it. One CEO in fact said he turned it off and almost had a riot on his hands!

During one discussion there was a difference of opinion on how to implement Chatter, and it does seem that size matters here. For smaller companies the recommendation was simply to turn it on, and people will start using it to good effect within hours, whereas for larger companies it seems that a more measured approach is recommended, perhaps starting in one area and then expanding as best practice emerges. The CEO of one larger company highlighted the need to be careful about what groups you use, what information goes out on Chatter and what stays in e-mail, and who you allow to chat with whom. This last point was illustrated by a user I spoke with who found that because it is easy to send messages to people without needing to know their e-mail address, the way to get noticed is to send it to the top-ranking person in the group; even if that individual doesn’t respond, it is likely that several followers will – and your objective is achieved.

There is an option for non-salesforce customers to subscribe to Chatter, and I am assured that some have done so, but I haven’t been able to speak to any yet. One way or another it seems chattering is here to stay, and salesforce’s main message to customers is to use it and their business will benefit. For others, putting together a business case might not be easy. It looks like Chatter is ready for business and has made some great progress since my colleague assessed it at the announcement in 2009 (See: “Salesforce Chatter Brings Social Collaboration and Media into Business “) and my assessment on its impact to customer service (See: “Salesforce Cloudforce – Socializing and Servicing Customers in the Clouds“). But Chatter does enable collaboration across a company, and this alone might justify an expenditure to rent and use it in the cloud. Are you a fan or user of Chatter? If so let me know.

Let me know your thoughts or come and collaborate with me on Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter.

Regards,

Richard Snow – VP & Global Research Director

Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 11 other followers

Twitter Updates

Blog Stats

  • 11,198 hits
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.